Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 5:14:33 GMT -5
Not sure if I am explaining this right but:
Is it a setting we have that people don't get generic availability (CI, MI, OF) or is it an ESPN thing?
Arguably Raburn should be OF eligible and be able to fill the OF spot as he played 35 combined games in the outfield in 2015. (18 in RF, 17 in LF)
This won't affect many players I wouldn't expect (and frankly Raburn isn't every day enough for me to be annoyed about it) but its a little frustrating when he met the 20 game cut-off at OF.
|
|
saltman
Administrator
Posts: 1,161
Favorite Baseball Team: Atlanta Braves
|
Post by saltman on Apr 2, 2016 6:40:28 GMT -5
It's just because we use specific positions (LF, CF, RF) rather than OF. I noticed it with a couple of others when doing roster checks back in the autumn, I think josh harrison was another one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 8:24:39 GMT -5
I can see the argument that he should be available to be placed in the generic-OF slot since he played OF so many times last year, but I think ESPN takes OF entitlement to mean "eligible at any of LF/CF/RF".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 10:36:53 GMT -5
I know every site does it differently
|
|